‘Ex’ Marking can be a complex thing. Equipment falling within the scope of IEC 60079-0 or ISO 80079-36 must be marked with various pieces of information, including the manufacturer’s name, the equipment type, and its operational parameters.

While consensus exists for how to express most parts, it is still lacking for the hazardous area code, or marking string.

In the beginning, the marking of equipment for potentially explosive environments was comparatively simple. Before the Second World War, a product was either ‘flameproof’ or ‘intrinsically safe’. Then, different types of hazardous area were identified, originally designated as Divisions, a term still used in the US. These morphed into Zones, with Zone 0 indicating the greatest risk and Zone 2 the least. Then manufacturers and purchasers of equipment realized that the expensive forms of protection used for ‘flameproof’ and ‘intrinsically safe’, were adding unnecessary costs onto equipment destined for Zone 2, and so the ‘Zone 2’, or ‘Division 2’, equipment concept was established. This became standard IEC 60079-15, providing protection in ‘normal operation’, and ‘flameproof’ became IEC 60079-1. Today, manufacturers have many more options available to them with a series of protection standards, ranging up to IEC 60079-40, although not all intermediate parts are used.

Currently electrical and electronic equipment is covered by nine different basic protection concepts, each one designated by a letter in the marking string – showing the suitability of a particular item of equipment for installation in a given zone. These are:

  • ‘Flameproof’ IEC 60079-1: Ex d
  • ‘Pressurization’ IEC 60079-2: Ex p
  • ‘Powder Filled’ IEC 60079-5: Ex q
  • ‘Oil Immersed’ IEC 60079-6: Ex o
  • ‘Increased Safety’ IEC 60079-7: Ex e
  • ‘Intrinsic Safety’ IEC 60079-11: Ex i
  • ‘Non-Sparking’ IEC 60079-15: Ex n
  • ‘Encapsulation’ IEC 60079-18: Ex m
  • ‘Protection by enclosure for explosive dust atmosphere’ IEC 60079-31: Ex t

This system is comparatively simple, for a single standard covering one type of protection and it can cover different levels of that form of protection. For example, a product covered by IEC 60079-18 ‘Encapsulation’ is identified by the letter ‘m’. This is then always followed by either ‘a’, ‘b’, or ‘c’ to show the three different levels of protection afforded by the product, giving “ma”, “mb” or “mc”.

However, in the real world, equipment may also be covered by more than one form of protection. For example, a fluorescent luminaire may have its lamp and terminals covered by ‘increased safety’, its ballast may be ‘encapsulated’ or ‘powder filled’, and its isolating switch may be ‘flameproof’. This means the marking string will have ‘e’, ‘m’ or ‘q’, and ‘d’. To standardise the writing of the marking string, these are now written in alphabetical order.

The marking string must also include the Equipment Protection Level (EPL) in a single, short-form two-letter designation. This indicates the overall level of protection and, hence, the Zone for which it is most suitable. Internationally, this followed the principle already established in Europe with the ATEX Categories. The equipment is not marked with the Zone, as that is a property of the physical location in a plant, and not a property of the equipment. Although there is a “normal correspondence” that equipment with EPL Ga can go in Zone 0, Gb in Zone 1 and Gc in Zone 2, this is not an absolute alignment and the ATEX User Directive 1999/92/EC (The DSEAR regulations in the UK) specifically allows a different alignment following a full risk assessment.

In addition, IEC 60079-0 also requires that marking for hazardous gas or vapor atmospheres and marking for hazardous dust atmospheres should not be combined. This helps to indicate that the equipment has two separate possible uses and not that it is suitable for use in a hybrid mixture of gas and dust.

In 2015, the first two parts of ISO 80079 for non-electrical equipment, parts 36 and 37, were published. These have been allocated the symbol ‘h’. Marking ‘h’ is simple enough when the product is solely non-electrical. There is, however, currently a lack of consensus on how to mark the product if a single item of equipment has both electrical and non-electrical protection. Some authorities prefer to keep the electrical and non-electrical marking separate but SGS favors expressing protection in a single marking string. This brings clarity to the situation with one EPL, one Group and one Temperature Class being marked.

For example, an installer will see either:

  • Ex db eb h IIB T3 Gb (SGS’s preferred method), or:
  • Ex db eb IIB T4 Gb
  • Ex h IIC T3 Ga

The first system is simpler, removes ambiguity, and puts the potential use of the equipment beyond doubt.

SGS Solutions

'Ex' marking is a complex business even without disagreement over the best way to express the marking string. Manufacturers need to work with a company that fully understands the importance of clarity, in order to be able to offer their products to the optimum number of potential customers.

SGS is the world’s leading certification specialist for equipment intended for use in explosive atmospheres. In Europe, it is a leading Notified Body, issuing certification compliant with European ATEX Directives. Internationally, it is at the forefront of the IECEx Equipment Certification Scheme, and has issued more certificates than any other certification body in the world. Its experts participate in committees formulating standards both in Europe and internationally.

Subscribe >
Follow us now on Linkedln >

Kerry Norcross
Business Development Manager
t: +44 (0) 1298 766608

ABOUT SGS

SGS is the world’s leading inspection, verification, testing and certification company. SGS is recognized as the global benchmark for quality and integrity. With more than 90,000 employees, SGS operates a network of over 2,000 offices and laboratories around the world.